<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside PR #39 &#8211; Tuesday, December 26, 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/</link>
	<description>Exploring the state of public relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 00:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/#comment-12070</guid>
		<description>Better late than never, folks. From the perspective of a government communicator, there is very little separation between GR and PR. There&#039;s a conscious distinction between the political and policy aspects of GR/PR (a distinction probably only understood by &quot;inside the beltway&quot; folks), but the links are evident - and force communicators to pay more attention to softer corporate issues like CSR, community relations, stakeholder interests and others that might be lost in an out-of-the-box PR program..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better late than never, folks. From the perspective of a government communicator, there is very little separation between GR and PR. There&#8217;s a conscious distinction between the political and policy aspects of GR/PR (a distinction probably only understood by &#8220;inside the beltway&#8221; folks), but the links are evident &#8211; and force communicators to pay more attention to softer corporate issues like CSR, community relations, stakeholder interests and others that might be lost in an out-of-the-box PR program..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-9878</link>
		<dc:creator>Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/#comment-9878</guid>
		<description>Actually, I didn&#039;t find Inside PR 38 all &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; soporific. For me as a non-PR professional, the 12 days theme was interesting. But maybe if y&#039;all recorded at a more civilized hour of the day, you&#039;d be more energetic and focused. I can&#039;t even manage to be conscious late at night, never mind alert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I didn&#8217;t find Inside PR 38 all <em>that</em> soporific. For me as a non-PR professional, the 12 days theme was interesting. But maybe if y&#8217;all recorded at a more civilized hour of the day, you&#8217;d be more energetic and focused. I can&#8217;t even manage to be conscious late at night, never mind alert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Hotchkiss</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-9523</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Hotchkiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/#comment-9523</guid>
		<description>In re: Show #39 and the discussion on whether GR should be considered part of PR rather than a separate discipline... I think the bigger issue is for PR to actively reach out within their organizations to form solid, collaborative relationships -- with HR, IT, Marketing, Customer Service, etc. Serving organizations and their internal and extermal PR needs today requires this kind of perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re: Show #39 and the discussion on whether GR should be considered part of PR rather than a separate discipline&#8230; I think the bigger issue is for PR to actively reach out within their organizations to form solid, collaborative relationships &#8212; with HR, IT, Marketing, Customer Service, etc. Serving organizations and their internal and extermal PR needs today requires this kind of perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-9343</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2006/12/26/inside-pr-39-tuesday-december-26-2006/#comment-9343</guid>
		<description>Do my ears deceive me? An episode of Inside PR without Chris Clarke commenting and producing? Blasphemy!

I actually haven&#039;t listened, but I will be sure to on my trek back to Toronto in a few short hours. I&#039;ll say it anyway, though: great show, guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do my ears deceive me? An episode of Inside PR without Chris Clarke commenting and producing? Blasphemy!</p>
<p>I actually haven&#8217;t listened, but I will be sure to on my trek back to Toronto in a few short hours. I&#8217;ll say it anyway, though: great show, guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

