<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside PR #58 &#8211; Tuesday, May 8, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/</link>
	<description>Exploring the state of public relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Chumley</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-76504</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Chumley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/#comment-76504</guid>
		<description>Great podcast.  

I&#039;d add a fourth category to your list of three uses of research.  Measurement and analysis.  If you&#039;ve done the formative research part properly then the evaluation is easier to do and a must do.  Correlating trends in media coverage to shifts in awareness and opinion is a simple example.  

Firm believer in the formative before evaluative research and the idea that PR can be a hard management science rooted in research and not strictly a words-based soft art.  

I heard someone say once that research is how an organization listens.  Well if organizations are increasingly interested in engaging stakeholders in discussions and not simply driving messages out then we&#039;re talking about a dialogue not a monologue.  Communicating &#039;with&#039; not only &#039;to&#039;.  Here we&#039;re really talking about relationships--the quality of which can be measured (innitially and over time) using survey research.  

Good job guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great podcast.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d add a fourth category to your list of three uses of research.  Measurement and analysis.  If you&#8217;ve done the formative research part properly then the evaluation is easier to do and a must do.  Correlating trends in media coverage to shifts in awareness and opinion is a simple example.  </p>
<p>Firm believer in the formative before evaluative research and the idea that PR can be a hard management science rooted in research and not strictly a words-based soft art.  </p>
<p>I heard someone say once that research is how an organization listens.  Well if organizations are increasingly interested in engaging stakeholders in discussions and not simply driving messages out then we&#8217;re talking about a dialogue not a monologue.  Communicating &#8216;with&#8217; not only &#8216;to&#8217;.  Here we&#8217;re really talking about relationships&#8211;the quality of which can be measured (innitially and over time) using survey research.  </p>
<p>Good job guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-74834</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 01:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/#comment-74834</guid>
		<description>Fair point Sallie!  I was just making sure you were still with us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point Sallie!  I was just making sure you were still with us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-72454</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 00:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/#comment-72454</guid>
		<description>I love it when Terry&#039;s wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when Terry&#8217;s wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-72212</link>
		<dc:creator>Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/08/inside-pr-58-tuesday-may-8-2007/#comment-72212</guid>
		<description>As a former academic, I applaud using research to drive your strategy. I would, however, take issue with one element of Inside PRoper English. &quot;Final results&quot; is not necessarily redundant. Many things have both short-term and long-term results, and research itself may produce interim results which the final results may or may not bear out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former academic, I applaud using research to drive your strategy. I would, however, take issue with one element of Inside PRoper English. &#8220;Final results&#8221; is not necessarily redundant. Many things have both short-term and long-term results, and research itself may produce interim results which the final results may or may not bear out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

