<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside PR #59 &#8211; Tuesday, May 15, 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/</link>
	<description>Exploring the state of public relations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Disruptive Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-80840</link>
		<dc:creator>Disruptive Conversations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/#comment-80840</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Ghost blogging and the coming end of the Golden Age of blogging and transparency...&lt;/strong&gt;

Let it neverbe forgotThat there once was a spotThat for one brief shining momentWas known as Camelot. - from the musical Camelot There has been a great conversation raging these past few months in the PR/marketing section of the blogosphere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ghost blogging and the coming end of the Golden Age of blogging and transparency&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Let it neverbe forgotThat there once was a spotThat for one brief shining momentWas known as Camelot. &#8211; from the musical Camelot There has been a great conversation raging these past few months in the PR/marketing section of the blogosphere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Wilburn</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-78945</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Wilburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/#comment-78945</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to comment on the major topic ghostwriting. I found the conflict to be very interesting so I did some digging through Wikipedia on the history of blogs themselves and found &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.diaryhistoryproject.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Online Diary History Project&lt;/A&gt;. The site is basically a collection of early bloggers reflections on why they were doing what they were doing back in the mid 90s that touched off the phenomenon we know as blogging and the overwhelming response is that they were doing it to &quot;connect and express&quot; in an authentic manner. 

This lack of authenticity is where I think ghostwriting goes off the rails a bit (what the podcast strongly tries to get at) . I personally agree with the disclosure recommendation in the podcast just to be as true to the format as possible yet still reaping maximum benefit from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to comment on the major topic ghostwriting. I found the conflict to be very interesting so I did some digging through Wikipedia on the history of blogs themselves and found <a HREF="http://www.diaryhistoryproject.com/" rel="nofollow">The Online Diary History Project</a>. The site is basically a collection of early bloggers reflections on why they were doing what they were doing back in the mid 90s that touched off the phenomenon we know as blogging and the overwhelming response is that they were doing it to &#8220;connect and express&#8221; in an authentic manner. </p>
<p>This lack of authenticity is where I think ghostwriting goes off the rails a bit (what the podcast strongly tries to get at) . I personally agree with the disclosure recommendation in the podcast just to be as true to the format as possible yet still reaping maximum benefit from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twist Image - Mitch Joel Blog - Marketing and Communication Insights</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-78750</link>
		<dc:creator>Twist Image - Mitch Joel Blog - Marketing and Communication Insights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/#comment-78750</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What’s Wrong With Ghost Blogging? Or Insights From Inside PR #59...&lt;/strong&gt;

I Blog often about my good friends, David Jones and Terry Fallis, who co-host the most excellent Podcast, Inside PR. In fact, I have the distinct pleasure of introducing David Jones tomorrow when he presents: Engage! How Social Media Can......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What’s Wrong With Ghost Blogging? Or Insights From Inside PR #59&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I Blog often about my good friends, David Jones and Terry Fallis, who co-host the most excellent Podcast, Inside PR. In fact, I have the distinct pleasure of introducing David Jones tomorrow when he presents: Engage! How Social Media Can&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Haslam</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-77207</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Haslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/#comment-77207</guid>
		<description>thanks for the show, as always, fellas. As one of the Topaz Partners folks, I appreciated the entire discussion on the &quot;ghost-blogging&quot; issue. There are a lot of opinions going around based on if/when/should you ghost blog, as well as some good explanations and discussion--of which you have been a big part-- of what the Air Hybrid Blog actually is-- and is not. 

The best thing you said is &quot;there are no rules.&quot; Some people try to make them, but all we can do is create something that serves our purpose, our constituents, and that we are honest about what we are doing. The nature of the social Web is that improvements/changes can be made on the fly to any suggestions made (as certainly happened in our case). It also means, as you suggested, that the definition of what is acceptable as a &quot;blog,&quot; or whatever you want to call any individual effort, adapts to reality on a continuing basis.

Also, on another point you made--the age of PR people being completely behind the scenes is o-v-e-r over. more and more, our pitching is in public. We are content producers. People know who we are, and we have to trust that what we are saying is compelling, valuable and legitimate.

Great show guys, longtime listener, thought I would finally come out of lurker mode!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the show, as always, fellas. As one of the Topaz Partners folks, I appreciated the entire discussion on the &#8220;ghost-blogging&#8221; issue. There are a lot of opinions going around based on if/when/should you ghost blog, as well as some good explanations and discussion&#8211;of which you have been a big part&#8211; of what the Air Hybrid Blog actually is&#8211; and is not. </p>
<p>The best thing you said is &#8220;there are no rules.&#8221; Some people try to make them, but all we can do is create something that serves our purpose, our constituents, and that we are honest about what we are doing. The nature of the social Web is that improvements/changes can be made on the fly to any suggestions made (as certainly happened in our case). It also means, as you suggested, that the definition of what is acceptable as a &#8220;blog,&#8221; or whatever you want to call any individual effort, adapts to reality on a continuing basis.</p>
<p>Also, on another point you made&#8211;the age of PR people being completely behind the scenes is o-v-e-r over. more and more, our pitching is in public. We are content producers. People know who we are, and we have to trust that what we are saying is compelling, valuable and legitimate.</p>
<p>Great show guys, longtime listener, thought I would finally come out of lurker mode!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</title>
		<link>http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-76632</link>
		<dc:creator>Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch")</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 21:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2007/05/15/inside-pr-59-tuesday-may-15-2007/#comment-76632</guid>
		<description>Y&#039;all must have ghost blogging on the mind at Thornley Fallis, as Bryan Person forwarded me a tweet on the subject from Joe Thornley on Monday. I won&#039;t repeat my message to him here; I&#039;ll just remind you and your listeners that you can hear my latest description of my own ghost blogging experience in my March 26th &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.podcastasylum.com/reports/?p=3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Report from the Asylum&lt;/a&gt; (last half of recording). That&#039;s at www.podcastasylum.com/reports/ in case live links aren&#039;t allowed in your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y&#8217;all must have ghost blogging on the mind at Thornley Fallis, as Bryan Person forwarded me a tweet on the subject from Joe Thornley on Monday. I won&#8217;t repeat my message to him here; I&#8217;ll just remind you and your listeners that you can hear my latest description of my own ghost blogging experience in my March 26th <a href="http://www.podcastasylum.com/reports/?p=3" rel="nofollow">Report from the Asylum</a> (last half of recording). That&#8217;s at <a href="http://www.podcastasylum.com/reports/" rel="nofollow">http://www.podcastasylum.com/reports/</a> in case live links aren&#8217;t allowed in your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
