Comments on: Inside PR #102 – Tuesday, March 11, 2008 http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2008/03/11/inside-pr-102-tuesday-march-11-2008/ Exploring the state of public relations Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:33:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch") http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2008/03/11/inside-pr-102-tuesday-march-11-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-382643 Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch") Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:01:56 +0000 http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2008/03/11/inside-pr-102-tuesday-march-11-2008/#comment-382643 Oops! Used a wrong form of "their"--how embarrassing. I must need more coffee. Oops! Used a wrong form of “their”–how embarrassing. I must need more coffee.

]]> By: Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch") http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2008/03/11/inside-pr-102-tuesday-march-11-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-382642 Sallie Goetsch (rhymes with "sketch") Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:01:25 +0000 http://www.insidepr.ca/index.php/2008/03/11/inside-pr-102-tuesday-march-11-2008/#comment-382642 I miss the chemistry between Terry and Dave when they're on they're own, but this was a fascinating discussion. I never knew what "off the record" *really* meant back in the pre-Internet days--and I suspect I may not be the only one. A point in favor of media training, definitely. I suspect the flow of discussion would be better--and the speaking time easier to distribute evenly--if there were just one additional person on the show each week. Certainly it would make keeping track of the voices simpler! I miss the chemistry between Terry and Dave when they’re on they’re own, but this was a fascinating discussion. I never knew what “off the record” *really* meant back in the pre-Internet days–and I suspect I may not be the only one. A point in favor of media training, definitely.

I suspect the flow of discussion would be better–and the speaking time easier to distribute evenly–if there were just one additional person on the show each week. Certainly it would make keeping track of the voices simpler!

]]>